Showing posts with label washington post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label washington post. Show all posts

Sunday, January 19, 2014

America is becoming more liberal

Reuters
Not too long ago, everyone was declaring American politics a lost cause for progressives. The religious right supposedly had a stranglehold on elections. Then it was the tea party that had the political establishment — initially Democrats and Republicans — quaking. The media and the general public took hold of a narrative parroted by conservative candidates and opinion leaders: The United States was a “center-right” nation.

But after two consecutive elections in which the Democratic candidate for president garnered more than 50 percent of the vote — a one-two punch last achieved by Franklin Roosevelt — it is worth questioning that assumption. The country is getting more diverse, and as the proportion of white voters shrinks, so, too, does the conservative base. As demographics shift, so do political preferences — in this case, toward the left. A close examination of U.S. attitudes in the past decade-plus reveals that the United States is steadily becoming more progressive.

It’s been well publicized how America has “evolved” on marriage equality. Washington Post/ABC News polling last year found that, by a margin of 58 percent to 36 percent , people believe their fellow Americans should be able to marry whomever they choose — something that would have been unthinkable less than a decade ago.

This progressive trend isn’t isolated to this issue. Over the past 10 or so years, national polls have shown that the general public is becoming more liberal on:

Immigration. The last time the nation considered immigration reform, in 2006, 52 percent of respondents told Gallup that the priority should be halting the flow of illegal immigration. Just 43 percent preferred to deal with the undocumented immigrants already here. When Gallup asked the same question last July, the numbers had flipped: 55 percent thought the focus should be on immigrants already here, while 41 percent said the priority should be strengthening U.S. borders.

● Marijuana. In 2000, just 31 percent of Americans believed marijuana should be legalized, Gallup found, and 64 percent were opposed. The pro-legalization number has since tracked steadily upward. In October Gallup polling, 58 percent of respondents favored legalization and just 39 percent were opposed.

Big business. Americans have grown more mistrustful of big business since 2002, when 50 percent of respondents told Gallup they were “very or somewhat satisfied” with the influence of major corporations. This number bottomed out at 29 percent in 2011 and 30 percent in 2012.

Attitudes are shifting in the states as well. In recent elections, states that were once reliably Republican red in presidential elections — including Colorado, North Carolina and Nevada— have become competitive or even solid Democratic blue.

In the November election in Virginia, issues well to the left of the “Old Virginia” (read: conservative) mainstream not only failed to hurt Democrats but might even have helped them. Gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe (D) was vocal about his support forexpanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, while Republican Ken Cuccinelli harped on Obamacare to curry favor with voters unhappy with the law. In the end, of course, McAuliffe won, and there was little evidence that health care hurt him or helped Cuccinelli’s final numbers. In the attorney general’s race, Democrat Mark Herring defied long-standing conventional wisdom and played up his position on gun safety. Herring defeated his opponent by pointing out Republican Mark Obenshain’s weak record on common-sense gun legislation such as comprehensive background checks and closing the gun-show loophole.

In the swing state of Iowa, recent extreme weather has convinced more people that the science behind climate change is real. In an Iowa State University annual poll of farmers — a traditionally conservative set — the share who believed in climate change last year was 74.3 percent, a significant jump from 67.7 percent in 2011, when the question was first asked.

It is more than an interesting observation that America now leans left. This should be a guiding light for politicians. With the knowledge that most Americans are, in fact, behind them, Democrats no longer need to fear running on their beliefs. They should stop letting special interests on the right hold ideas and ideals hostage and start listening to voters.

And what are the American people saying? That they’re fed up with political obstructionism and conservative policies that have left the country at a standstill. They want a new direction.

Progressives have an opportunity not only to come into the mainstream but also to lead — and shape public opinion. President Obama began to do just that last month with a speech decrying income inequality. To feed the vacuum of economic discontent, Democrats ought to argue for populist solutions such as raising the minimum wage, raising taxes on millionaires and corporations, rebuilding infrastructure, investing in education and instituting paid sick leave. Americans crave solutions, and they are moving to the left to find them. Smart politicians ought to get ahead of them.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

D.C. has three of the most "whitened" zip codes

Via Michael J. Petrilli at the Fordham Institute’s Flypaper education blog comes a list of the 25 U.S. Zip codes which saw the greatest gain in white population share from 2000 to 2010.

In the absence of 2010 economic data, which is yet to be released, Petrilli uses the relative change in white population to gauge the impact of gentrification.

Three of the top 25 are in D.C. — only Brooklyn, N.Y., with four Zips, is more represented on the list. The particular D.C. Zip codes identified will come as little surprise to city denizens:

No. 10: 20001 — Shaw/Bloomingale/LeDroit Park/Truxton Circle/Pleasant Plains — 5.6 percent non-Hispanic white in 2000 to 32.8 percent in 2010.

No. 14: 20010 — Mount Pleasant/Columbia Heights/Park View — 22 percent non-Hispanic white in 2000 to 46.7 percent in 2010.

No. 19: 20005 — Logan Circle/Downtown — 47.3 percent non-Hispanic white in 2000 to 68.4 percent in 2010.

Topping the list are a several unexpected locales — Columbia, S.C., Chattanooga, Tenn., and Roanoke, Va. Petrilli writes that gentrification “is not a phenomenon limited to a few of our great coastal cities. These gentrifying neighborhoods are literally all over the map.”

Source

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Pinterest: Digital crack for women


I’ve made 17 attempts at writing this column in the past three days.

The pattern is always the same: turn on the computer, log in to Pinterest and lose myself in the site’s churning cycle of interest, hope, inspiration, jealousy, desperation, despair and depression.

Pinterest is the hottest new social-networking tool. And it’s digital crack for women.

Even the tech world says this. “Pinterest is exceptionally sticky and keeps it users engaged for long periods of time,” comScore wrote in a blog in December.

It is surging in popularity, with about 11 million unique visitors last month, according to Forbes. The tech world is gaga over a site that may have reached the 10-million-user mark faster than any other.

What this amounts to is a virtual pin board, a space to organize photos from all over the Internet.

I know. It sounded useless to me, too. Then I visited it and fell down the black hole time suck that it is.

The bulletin boards are simple, clean spaces filled with cool pictures of food, crafts, travel spots, home remodeling and decorating ideas, fitness tips, hairstyles, furniture, architecture, kid projects, cute animal photos, cheeky sayings and wedding plans.

It’s the photo scrapbook of hopes, dreams and desires for grown-ups, mostly those of the female persuasion. And that raises the question of whether that’s actually a healthy thing for grown women to be spending time compiling a virtual hope chest.

Pinterest women give themselves parameters like addicts who are in the full bloom of denial: “Only after 9 p.m.” or “Only on the weekends and never at work.”

As one commenter put it on the DC Urban Moms forum: “so sorry that i was introduced to this. it’s very addicting.”

And it has come along at the perfect time, just as the novelty of Facebook is fading, having assured you that your ex is adequately mediocre and now your mom and your boss have friended you.

And unlike Facebook or Twitter, where it is ultimately obvious that your profile photo is from 1987 and your check-ins are no more exotic than Dairy Queen, Pinterest boards (which can never be made private), advertise only your hopes and dreams, the Stilton Gold style you aspire to, rather than the Velveeta life you live.

There is a game we’ve started playing in our house to underscore the eternal optimism of Pinterest. My husband gives me a word, I search for it on the site.

“Toilet paper rolls?” You get photos of delicate wall sculptures, wedding favor packages, seedling pots and adorable owls made from them.

“Tree frog?” Cute froggy pictures, a tree frog bento lunch, a knitting project and a full set of women’s toenails delicately painted with tree frog pictures.

“Bottle caps?” Necklaces, purses and wall hangings.

“Footballs?” Truffles, eclairs and deviled eggs, of course.

“Kitty litter?” The kitty litter cake (gross).

“Blizzard?” Romantic photos of snowflakes falling.

“Motor oil?” Vases.

I finally stumped it with “dipping tobacco” and “jock straps.”

Pinterest revolves around the idealistic, stylized catalogue scenes and magazine photos I have worked hard to ban from my life because they inevitably leave me feeling inadequate, messy, hideous and hopeless.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Burger King to deliver in DC

Right around lunchtime this afternoon, my dog Andy the Barking Schnoodle lost his mind. That could only mean one thing: Someone was at the door. In the Rosenwald household, that’s usually a food delivery driver, and that driver is usually handing off pizza or Chinese.
Whopper meal delivered to the home of the author of this article.

Today the driver handed me a Whopper, fries, a Diet Coke, a salad and a Hershey’s sundae pie. The smell of fries on my doorstep was a rather new and perplexing aroma.

Burger King is testing delivery at about 10 locations in Maryland and Virginia, and I decided to test it at my house. Once the food finally got here, it was pretty darn good: The fries were hot and crispy, the Whopper was fresh and unsoggy, the salad was pretty and delightful and the pie — I was too full for that.

My opinion: The burger giant, at constant war with McDonald’s, might be on to something, if you’re into this sort of thing — massive amounts of calories and fried food procured with very little effort. Ordering the food, which I did online, was as easy and quick as ordering diapers from Amazon.com.

Fast food burger delivery is new to me and new to America, but it is popular in Asia and parts of Europe. Burger King officials told me they want to translate that success to the American delivery market, which since the beginning of time has been dominated by pizza.

The business rationale: Consumers aren’t getting less busy, and their appetite for hamburgers — with even famous chefs such as Bobby Flay opening burger joints — seems insatiable. Being in the fast food business probably gives executives an iron stomach, which is what they will need to take on the likes of Domino’s.

“Pizza is what people think of first when it comes to delivery, and they have done a wonderful job at it,” said Jonathan Fitzpatrick, the company’s chief brand and operations manager. “But really there is no good burger delivery in the United States. That’s our challenge to try to do that.”

The company is targeting busy families, and it has tweaked its menu to offer meals that can feed a small army. Options include 10 cheeseburgers and 20-piece chicken tenders ($14.49), 40 piece chicken tenders and two drinks ($10.99), as well as your standard Whopper combo with fries and a drink ($6.38).

Burger King picked the D.C. region as a test area because of a good mix of demographics — we’re urban, we’re suburban, and we have a lot of working families. The company says it is using special thermal packaging to wrap the food and haul it, and the goal is to get it — hot and fresh — to the customer’s door within a half hour.

They certainly failed on the second part for me.

I ordered around 11:30 a.m. and was told in an e-mail that the food would be there by noon. Yay! Noon came, nothing. Then 12:15 p..m, nothing — just Andy the Barking Schnoodle staring out the front window anxious for someone to bark at.

Finally, at 12:30 p.m., Andy spotted the driver climbing the front steps with my lunch. The delivery containers the driver carried looked similar to what pizza is delivered in. I said, “Smells good.” He said, “It’s fresh.” I went inside to chow down.

I opened the burger container but only saw the lower half — the patty topped with pickles, onions and ketchup. The other half, with the bread top and lettuce and mayo, was hidden behind a trap door. The reason should be obvious to even amateur burger eaters: putting the whole sandwich together for even a five-minute drive would result in a soggy mess.

Nice move, Burger King.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Wikipedia blackout tomorrow

Wikipedia will black out its Web site on Wednesday to protest SOPA, a version of anti-piracy legislation that’s being considered by Congress.


Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales made the announcement on Twitter on Monday, saying the site would shut down English versions of the crowd-sourced online encyclopedia at midnight Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday until midnight on Wednesday.

Wales called the move a “community decision.” He pointed to a page that was created to gauge support for a possible blackout. Users have until 6:59 p.m. today to weigh in on the decision.

Wales and other SOPA opponents hope to draw attention to language in SOPA that, according to some, is too broad and could hurt free speech and innovation.

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales. (AP) Wikipedia is not alone in its plans for a blackout. Reddit and the Cheezburger network that includes sites like The Daily What and Fail Blog also plan to shut down to protest SOPA. The document service Scribd already made a billion pages vanish. Craigslist boasts a notice on their frontpage saying “Stop SOPA and PIPA. [The bills] are threatening Craigslist and the rest of your Internet. Most of the web sites you use strongly oppose these bills.”

The online protests are changing the debate.

Over the weekend, the White House hinted that it would oppose the current version of the bill. And key sponsors are stepping away from its most controversial aspects.

If Wikipedia blacks out as promised, Wales expects an estimated 25 million daily visitors to be affected. His advice for students who might rely on the site: “Do your homework early.”

Source

Friday, December 2, 2011

Lady Gaga's video for "Marry The Night"



If you cannot watch the video because you're at work (womp womp), here is a summary from The Washington Post:

The 13-minute epic opens on Mama Monster in some sort of hospital, bruised up and declaring, “I’m gonna be star. You know why? (Pause for dramatic crying.) Because I have nothing to lose.”

Cut to Gaga as a ballerina, then as a French speaker in a flat getting a call from a “director” who delivers some unspecified bad news. The singer loses her mind — in an artsy way — tearing the apartment apart, covering her naked (but censored) body in cereal and dying her hair in the bathtub.

Lady Gaga Vevo The song, and that moment in particular, is autobiographical. Gaga told E! that it represents the day she was dropped from Island Def Jam. (Apparently, she was really nude when the call came in.)

“You may say I lost everything,” a reborn Gaga says in the video. “But I still had my bedazzler.”

The video begins to take a more traditional form around the eight-minute mark, when the song actually starts to play. Gaga and crew perform dance numbers in a studio, a city street and on and in a car, which is on fire by the end of the song.

For anyone concerned that Gaga was losing some of her wacky edge (see her traditional Thanksgiving special), “Marry the Night” should both blow and ease their minds.

Watch the video, which is slightly NSFW because of one word and some censored skin, here.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

UVA researcher tracks causes of student death

How many college students die each year from alcohol-related injuries? Or car crashes? Or suicide?

There are many groups that calculate estimates, but James C. Turner, director of the Department of Student Health at the University of Virginia, says an official count hasn’t been taken in more than 70 years. So during his term as president of the American College Health Association, Turner asked more than 1,150 schools to share their mortality rates for students between the ages of 18 and 24 during the 2009-10 academic year.

Just over 150 public and private schools responded, and from what Turner has learned so far, death rates for college students could be significantly lower than previously estimated — especially for alcohol-related injuries and traffic deaths. He said the leading cause of student deaths could be suicide.

At the schools he surveyed, Turner said that for every 100,000 students there were just over six suicides and fewer than five alcohol-related deaths. (If you combine alcohol-related traffic deaths with those that did not involve alcohol, there were nearly seven deaths per 100,000 students.)

While alcohol abuse is still a critical issue on most campuses, Turner said student depression and other mental health issues need just as much attention. And there is a dire need for standardized methodology for tracking and reporting student deaths.

“My plea is that future studies look at school data and not simply extrapolations” of data for college-aged students, said Turner, who presented his findings at an American Public Health Association meeting Wednesday afternoon.

Many of those extrapolations are calculated by Ralph W. Hingson, who has closely studied trends in alcohol-related deaths on college campuses for years. Hingson said that because college administrators are not required to track or report student deaths, the numbers they volunteer to researchers are likely underestimates.

You can read Turner’s abstract and presentation on the American Public Health Association Web site.

Monday, November 14, 2011

Who makes D.C.'s best sandwich?

The results are in from last week’s completely unscientific National Sandwich Day poll. The question we asked was, “Who makes the best sandwiches in the D.C. area?”

Well, it was a total landslide: After 2,162 votes, the runaway winner was SUNdeVICH...at 35 percent! Taylor Gourmet was the runner-up with 18 percent, while the Italian Store finished third with 11 percent.

It’s worth noting that there was no one-person, one-vote rule in play here. But despite having a weird name and being notoriously hard to find (it’s located in a converted garage in an alley near the Convention Center), SUNdeVICH is deserving of the honor, making globally-inspired sandwiches that are nonpareil in this town; where else will you find beef tongue, mustard and pickled vegetables on a baguette around here?

Fast Gourmet finished with just 3 percent of the vote, a shockingly-low total for a place that, despite being situated in a gas station, has won unrestrained, euphoric raves from bloggers (here, here, here and here) and food critics alike.

Also receiving write-in votes: Jetties, Cornercopia and Le Petit Corner Store.

Here's the full list of results:

A.M. Wine Shoppe: 3%
Booeymonger: 3%
The Butcher’s Block: 7%
Earl’s Sandwiches: 2%
Fast Gourmet: 3%
G Street Food: 1%
The Italian Store: 11%
Mangialardo and Sons: 7%
SUNdeVICH: 35%
Taylor Gourmet: 18%
Wagshal’s: 3%
Other: 7%
Total votes: 2,162

Source

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Steve Jobs and the idea of letting go

Remember a few years ago, when your Apple store on any given Saturday afternoon ceased being the clean, technological zendo you once admired — the place you bought your iMac — and instead became a crowded bazaar of idealized wonder and hopeless waits at the Genius Bar?

The movement spread. People built their lives around the objects Steve Jobs gave them: the MacBook, the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad. What happened with Jobs and Apple over the past decade is one of the rare participatory phenomena of our disconnected and no-longer-common culture. It was as if this generation’s defining event took place in a shopping plaza and then up in the “cloud,” and this time everyone (that is, everyone who could afford Apple products) got to go to Woodstock.

As word of Steve Jobs' death spread, Apple users passing by the company's store in New York City's Meatpacking District remembered Jobs as a great innovator who made technology feel personal. (Oct. 5)

People stopped lining up for concert tickets and started lining up for new phones. This was the future right in front of you. It was sleek, responding to your touch. Imagine explaining an iPad to someone from 1984. They might get it, they might not.

Jobs died Wednesday at age 56 after a long battle with pancreatic cancer that his wasting form came to wear as familiarly as his preference for outdated jeans and black turtlenecks. When news of his death broke around 7:30 p.m. on the East Coast, a good number of us sought immediate solace (to say nothing of information) from our Apple stuff. The rippling tweets and shares fanned outward.

Swipe, swipe, touch. The nighttime news anchors, fearful of the obsolescence that dogs them at every turn, turned to ­social-media feeds for confirmation of a shared sense of loss; they invited hipster tech writers and thinkers who scorn old-media ways to make themselves available to grieve analytically on the air. (The digital air, that is; in Jobs’s world, we sacrificed the broadcast band to the broadband.) You can easily imagine newspaper assignment desks, similarly afflicted with professional hypochondria, scrambling reporters to Apple stores to gather quotes from the bereaved.

That is what Steve Jobs gave us: the future. A sense of ourselves moving forward into this century, which has proved especially hard to do, with its lack of employment opportunities and its addiction to panic. He gave us a look at the future and all the ambivalence and worry that comes with it. It was the most elegant form of social disruption, and now your kids won’t glance up from their iPhones. They’ll never need to.

We spend a lot of time wishing for the past, carping about our gizmos and the sway they lord over us, while loading up our iPods with songs that were popular when we were in high school, while stalking old boyfriends on Facebook. That in itself is a pleasant form of grief, but it is grief all the same.

Jobs kept nudging us away from that. Under his leadership, Apple’s subliminal selling point was: Let it go. Let go of the uneasiness about computers. Let go of ugly, antique technology. Let go of the fantasy future of personal rocketships. Let go of the expensive, shiny new phone that you bought last year for the slightly less expensive, shiny new phone that’s coming out this year. But let go of something deeper, something resistant in you that romanticizes the past.

In 2011, so much of our culture — as well as our politics — feels as though we’re losing grip on the old, beloved things. Where did record stores go? What happened to letters that come in the mail? Where did movie theaters go? What about the books? Where is my Main Street? Where is my America?

Jobs had been teaching us to say goodbye to all that for decades — we just didn’t know it. Some of us said goodbye to typewriters in the 1980s when we finished term papers using MacWrite on a Macintosh Plus for the first time. Some of us said goodbye when we made PTA fliers and “Lost Dog” posters that were far and away better than their Sharpie-scrawled predecessors. Let it go, let it go: Take your CDs to Goodwill; give your books to the library sale.

It was therefore an irresistible metaphor, in these final years, when the auditorium lights would go down and the crowd would go wild for Jobs, who increasingly greeted his followers and touted the latest neat, new thing even as he wore the look of a person who was not going into that future with us. He would be getting off here; we were to proceed without him into the unknown. Let it go and look ahead was the message all along.

Source